AutoSitu reviews full plan sets for QA/QC, firm standards, coordination, code compliance and constructability — so your senior architects and engineers spend their hours resolving the issues that require judgment instead of searching drawings for them.
Principals, technical directors, QA/QC leads and experienced project architects have the judgment — not the hours to review every drawing on every project.
Hundreds of sheets, schedules, details, notes, consultant drawings and requirements have to be checked before every milestone.
A coordination issue found in-house is a markup. The same issue found in plan check or in the field becomes resubmission work, an RFI, redesign, rework — or exposure.
AutoSitu reviews the set in parallel against firm standards, code requirements, coordination conditions and constructability risk, then surfaces the exceptions that require professional judgment. Instead of asking senior staff to find every issue, give them the highest-value issues to resolve.
Give every project the attention of your best technical reviewer.
Check sheet organization, graphic and annotation standards, title blocks, general notes and detail conventions against your own documentation standards — on the projects a principal never has time to open.
Cross-sheet consistency, schedule-to-plan agreement, dimension conflicts, missing references and the internal contradictions that plan reviewers and contractors find first.
Compare architectural, structural, civil and MEP documents against each other to surface conflicts, gaps and assumptions that only appear when the disciplines are read together.
Review egress, accessibility, life safety, zoning and jurisdiction-specific requirements against the applicable code, with the source cited behind each finding, before the set becomes a plan-check comment.
Surface the details most likely to generate RFIs, substitutions or field changes, then run the next issue and see exactly what changed between revisions.
Verified platform totals across the projects AutoSitu has analyzed — not modeled savings.
Give every set the first pass your best reviewer would do if they had the hours — and keep their judgment on the issues that actually need it.