UpCodes is the stronger choice for teams that mainly need searchable access to adopted codes, amendments, diagrams, assemblies, code comparison, and cited research answers. AutoSitu is the broader choice for teams that need requirements applied to real project files across feasibility, completeness, departmental compliance review, enterprise QA/QC, quantity takeoff, and scope analysis.
Decision guide
Evidence: UpCodes code library, current UpCodes pricing, and AutoSitu departmental compliance review.
The narrow concession
UpCodes is the more mature, accessible research workspace when the daily job is finding, interpreting, comparing, and organizing code information.
UpCodes brings adopted codes, local amendments, updates, errata, effective dates, and change history into one searchable research environment.
Teams can compare code years or jurisdictions and work with more than 2,000 diagrams and 12,000 UL, GA, and UpCodes assemblies.
Professional includes unlimited Copilot questions fenced to jurisdiction codes and amendments, with links to supporting sections, diagrams, and assemblies.
UpCodes publishes per-user Essentials and Professional prices and offers a documented two-week trial for paid plans.
The broader system
One project. One evolving source of intelligence — from feasibility and jurisdiction review through quantities and construction readiness.
Planning and zoning, engineering and public works, fire, building, environmental, and specialized requirements are applied to the same drawings in parallel.
Required forms, sheets, studies, notes, stamps, and cross-document consistency are checked before substantive jurisdiction review begins.
Feasibility assumptions, entitlement constraints, compliance findings, QA/QC decisions, quantities, and scope remain connected to one evolving project.
The same project understanding continues into all-division takeoff, revision deltas, buyout packages, and scope-gap analysis.
What changes by workflow
UpCodes is the clearer fit for a person who needs to search adopted codes, compare editions or jurisdictions, review inline amendments, find diagrams and assemblies, and save research into a project. AutoSitu uses jurisdiction requirements inside project review, but it is not positioned as a replacement for a dedicated self-serve code library.
AutoSitu's differentiation begins when requirements must be applied to actual site plans, building sets, civil documents, landscape sheets, reports, and schedules. Reviews are organized by jurisdiction department, with citations and sheet locations attached to findings. UpCodes now offers AI Plan Review, but its pricing page currently labels that capability early access and Enterprise-only.
AutoSitu carries the same project understanding into completeness, enterprise QA/QC, quantities, revision comparison, scope gaps, and buyout. UpCodes extends from code research into specifications and early-access plan review, but it is not presented as an all-division takeoff or construction-scope platform.
Pricing
UpCodes publishes self-serve per-user pricing and a two-week trial. AutoSitu scopes pricing to the project-review workflow, implementation, jurisdictions, and support required.
AutoSitu
Custom quote
Fees and subscription terms are governed by the applicable order form, invoice, subscription agreement, or statement of work.
UpCodes
From $39 / user / month
Essentials is $39 annually or $45 monthly. Professional is $59 annually or $68 monthly. Enterprise is quote-based; AI Plan Review is currently early access and Enterprise-only.
Hold these constant across quotes
Recommendation
The right choice depends on whether the bottleneck is researching requirements or applying them across the project.
Your primary need is frequent, self-directed research across adopted codes and amendments, supported by comparison, diagrams, assemblies, projects, and cited Copilot answers.
Your larger problem is applying requirements to project files across feasibility, completeness, parallel departmental compliance, enterprise QA/QC, takeoff, and construction scope.
UpCodes can support day-to-day code research while AutoSitu applies project and jurisdiction requirements to drawings and carries findings into broader development and construction workflows.
Comparison FAQ
Direct answers for teams deciding between AutoSitu and UpCodes.
Evidence
Product, pricing, availability, coverage, and workflow claims were checked against these references in August 2026.
Bring a current site, drawing set, code question, or review package. See where dedicated research ends and connected project review begins.
Schedule Private Demo